My seven year daughter, who has had diabetes since the age of one, was just diagnosed with celiac disease. In the process of diagnosis, the gastroenterologist suggested she have the rash on her knees biopsied for dermatitis herpetiformis by a dermatologist (because it was less invasive than the intestinal biopsy). The dermatologist looked at the rash and said that it was not dermatitis herpetiformis, but proceeded to do a biopsy of her forearm anyway. Is it possible to determine dermatitis herpetiformis from skin that does not have a lesion? Everything that I have read says that the biopsy must be done on the border of the lesion. Eventually, she was diagnosed with celiac disease via intestinal biopsy.
One of my textbook references regarding the biopsy of tissue to help establish a diagnosis of dermatitis herpetiformis indicates that:Skin biopsies for immunofluorescence studies are taken from adjacent normal or faintly erythematous skin... Multiple specimens may be needed to obtain positive findings because of the focal nature of deposits. Normal skin sites of more than 3 mm from a lesion or sites in areas not commonly involved may test negative.
Original posting 11 May 2001
Posted to Other Illnesses
|Return to the Top of This Page|
Last Updated: Tuesday April 06, 2010 15:09:22
This Internet site provides information of a general nature and is designed for educational purposes only. If you have any concerns about your own health or the health of your child, you should always consult with a physician or other health care professional.
This site is published by T-1 Today, Inc. (d/b/a Children with Diabetes), a 501c3 not-for-profit organization, which is responsible for its contents. Our mission is to provide education and support to families living with type 1 diabetes.
© Children with Diabetes, Inc. 1995-2018. Comments and Feedback.