From Northern Coastal California, USA:
In the literature regarding A1cs, I've seen it stated that it is an average over the past two to three months. Yet, I also have read that "glucose binds irreversibly to hemoglobin molecules." So, will only one episode of hyperglycemia lasting only hours just prior to the test cause the A1c result (which represents two to three months of control) to be disproportionately higher due to irreversibly saturated hemoglobin, or is it truly an average of the longer time period? To rephrase, what if I have good control for three months and then have high blood sugar the week before the test? Will the results reflect an average, or will it appear that my blood sugar has been roughly as high as the recent hyperglycemic week?
I like to think of the A1c test like an M & M candy coating -- every time your sugar rises, it coats the surface of the red blood cell. The thicker the coating, the more episodes of high glucose over about half the life of the cell (about two months). So, it is the accumulation it is measuring over the entire time.
Original posting 13 Sep 2005
Posted to A1c, Glycohemoglobin, HgbA1c
|Return to the Top of This Page|
Last Updated: Tuesday April 06, 2010 15:10:04
This Internet site provides information of a general nature and is designed for educational purposes only. If you have any concerns about your own health or the health of your child, you should always consult with a physician or other health care professional.
This site is published by T-1 Today, Inc. (d/b/a Children with Diabetes), a 501c3 not-for-profit organization, which is responsible for its contents. Our mission is to provide education and support to families living with type 1 diabetes.
© Children with Diabetes, Inc. 1995-2018. Comments and Feedback.