From Red Deer, Alberta, Canada:
Is there any truth to the statistic that a child with type 1 has a 6% chance of being "dead in bed" over the course of their life? This seems way too high. My nine-year-old son has been having numerous lows in the night and isn't waking for them any more. We are decreasing his background insulin and stressing that he must feed for his increased exercise.
I suspect that this number is too high. There are some studies from Scandinavia that have looked into this dilemma. Periodic nocturnal monitoring is recommended since we (scientifically) know that many episodes of nocturnal hypoglycemia go undetected by routine monitoring of blood glucose during the day and only about 50% of such nocturnal episodes produce sufficient symptoms to awaken a person with type 1 diabetes. One of the big potential advantages of continuous glucose monitoring systems (CGMS) is the ability to alarm for nocturnal hypoglycemia. One of the big advantages of insulin pumps over conventional treatment is also the ability to fine tune and adjust hour by hour overnight. Similarly, Lantus and Levemir have big advantages over NPH and Lente insulins because they have less peaks overnight while still providing excellent and more stable/predictable basal coverage than older insulins.
Original posting 7 Apr 2009
Posted to Other
|Return to the Top of This Page|
Last Updated: Tuesday April 06, 2010 15:10:18
This Internet site provides information of a general nature and is designed for educational purposes only. If you have any concerns about your own health or the health of your child, you should always consult with a physician or other health care professional.
This site is published by T-1 Today, Inc. (d/b/a Children with Diabetes), a 501c3 not-for-profit organization, which is responsible for its contents. Our mission is to provide education and support to families living with type 1 diabetes.
© Children with Diabetes, Inc. 1995-2018. Comments and Feedback.