icon-nav-help
Need Help

Submit your question to our team of health care professionals.

icon-nav-current-questions
Current Question

See what's on the mind of the community right now.

icon-conf-speakers-at-a-glance
Meet the Team

Learn more about our world-renowned team.

icon-nav-archives
CWD Answers Archives

Review the entire archive according to the date it was posted.

CWD_Answers_Icon
October 15, 2005

Other

advertisement
Question from Michigan, USA:

Within the context of the medical recommendation that kids with type 1 diabetes be on the Priority List for the flu vaccine, there has been a discussion of whether their immune system is considered “compromised” versus “dysfunctional.” Is their immune system “compromised” or “dysfunctional?” If our kids’ immune systems were fine, with the exception of the attack on the beta cells, it seems there would be no need for special recognition with regard to things like the flu vaccine.

Answer:

From: DTeam Staff

There is no evidence that, with reasonable, not even great glucose control, the kids that we see have any more risk from flu or other infectious disease than the general population of kids. The only major risk is related to what happens when a person with diabetes gets another illness, i.e., ketoacidosis management. So, most of the immunization recommendations in our practice and most other pediatric endocrine practices around the world are not any different for immunization recommendations. The general CDC type recommendations are all-inclusive and especially important for the vast majority of folks with diabetes who have chronic out-of-control hyperglycemia. Or, they also have heart compromise issues. Simply stated, we do not make a big push for such things as flu vaccines, but do not oppose them if parents/patients so desire.

The issue of immune dysfunction as a cause of the diabetes in the first place is much more complicated and has to do about genetic control of autoimmunity. I suspect that this is very different than fighting off viruses and bacteria. Most of the old literature about poor ability to mount immune responses for such exogenous “illnesses” really reflect chronic hyperglycemia. We just do not see such problems nowadays. However, our clinic-wide A1c avenge is 7.4% and not 10-12% as in many other sites.

SB